primer
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
primer [2014/01/16 14:49] tom_mandel |
primer [2014/01/18 00:15] tom_mandel |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Traditional science has always taken apart, based on the assumption that knowledge based on the parts would reveal how it works. Modern systemic science has found actual knowledge is the | Traditional science has always taken apart, based on the assumption that knowledge based on the parts would reveal how it works. Modern systemic science has found actual knowledge is the | ||
| - | relationship of the assumed parts rather than the parts alone. | + | relationship of the assumed parts together rather than the parts alone. Actual reality is |
| + | the uni-verse working together. | ||
| - | ==(UNI-VERSE WORKING TOGETHER)== | ||
| - | === SYSTEM STUDIES === | ||
| - | SYSTEMS THEORY/SCIENCE/THINKING/APPROACH/METHODOLOGY is a transdisciplinary and multiperspective scientific inquiry that studies structure and properties in terms of their interrelationships. Ervin Laszlo contrasts the system model with the Classical science model of reductionism as a shifting of emphasis from parts to the organization of parts; from the "component to the dynamic" as he puts it. Erich Jantsch writes, "Quite generally, a system becomes observable and definable through its interactions. <ref>Jantsch E (1980) The Self-Organizing-Universe. Pergamon Press</ref> They emphasize that it is through these mutually interactive relationships that new properties of the whole emerge. Bela H Banathy regards this observation to be the "value" of systems theory; as this new whole has properties which are not found in the constituent elements. "We cannot understand the whole bit by bit" he explains.[1] <!--(See Note 1:) --> | + | == SYSTEM STUDIES == |
| - | ---- | + | SYSTEMS THEORY/SCIENCE/THINKING/APPROACH/METHODOLOGY is a transdisciplinary and multiperspective scientific inquiry that studies structure and properties in terms of their interrelationships. Ervin Laszlo contrasts the system model with the Classical science model of reductionism as a shifting of emphasis from parts to the organization of parts; from the "component to the dynamic" as he puts it. Erich Jantsch writes, "Quite generally, a system becomes observable and definable through its interactions. in Jantsch E (1980) The Self-Organizing-Universe. Pergamon Press They emphasize that it is through these mutually interactive relationships that new properties of the whole emerge. Bela H Banathy regards this observation to be the "value" of systems theory; as this new whole has properties which are not found in the constituent elements. "We cannot understand the whole bit by bit" he explains.[1] ---- |
| ==Foreword== | ==Foreword== | ||
| Line 126: | Line 125: | ||
| - | [[Systeming at a glance]] Gase at the ISSS symbol and how it shows us the difference between the part and the whole. | + | [[Systeming at a glance]] Gaze at the ISSS symbol and it will show us the difference between the part and the whole. |
| ---- | ---- | ||
primer.txt · Last modified: 2020/07/27 15:38 (external edit)
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
